Abstract
Dental clinics are exposed to various uncomfortable noises. The aim of this study was to quantify the effectiveness of active noise control devices in dental treatment conditions. Two types of commercial headsets (Airpods Pro, QC30) and two types of dental headsets (Alltalk, Quieton Dental) were used for the experiment. Three sounds (high-speed handpiece, low-speed handpiece, and suction system) were measured at three different distances from the dental teeth model, typodont. The distances of 10, 40, and 70 cm reflected the positions of the patient, assistant, and practitioner’s ears, respectively. Sound analysis was performed, and the significance of differences in the maximum noise level using each device was determined with the Kruskal–Wallis test. Dental noise was characterized by the peak in sound pressure level (SPL) at 4–5 kHz and >15 kHz frequencies. The commercial headsets efficiently blocked 1 kHz and 10 kHz of noise. The dental headsets efficiently reduced 4–6 and >15 kHz noise. Quieton had the highest maximum SPL in all situations and positions among the four devices. For a better dental clinic, however, active noise control devices more suitable for the characteristics of dental noise should be developed.
Funder
ministry of health and welfare of Republic of Korea
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference21 articles.
1. Some physiologic responses to high-speed handpiece noises;Rapp;Dent. Dig.,1971
2. Assessment of noise exposures in a pediatric dentistry residency clinic;Jadid;Pediatr. Dent.,2011
3. Decibel ratings of dental office sounds
4. Effect of Noise Cancelling Devices on Dental Handpieces Using Ear Model
5. Hearing of dentists in the long run: a 15-year follow-up study
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献