Affiliation:
1. Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
2. School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Abstract
This paper examines the impact and implications of ChatGPT and other generative AI technologies within the African context while looking at the ethical benefits and concerns that are particularly pertinent to the continent. Through a robust analysis of ChatGPT and other generative AI systems using established approaches for analysing the ethics of emerging technologies, this paper provides unique ethical benefits and concerns for these systems in the African context. This analysis combined approaches such as anticipatory technology ethics (ATE), ethical impact assessment (EIA), and ethical issues of emerging ICT applications with AI (ETICA) with specific issues from the literature. The findings show that ChatGPT and other generative AI systems raise unique ethical concerns such as bias, intergenerational justice, exploitation of labour and cultural diversity in Africa but also have significant ethical benefits. These ethical concerns and benefits are considered crucial in shaping the design and deployment of ChatGPT and similar technologies responsibly. It further explores the potential applications of ChatGPT in critical domain areas such as education, agriculture, and healthcare, thereby demonstrating the transformative possibilities that these technologies can have on Africa. This paper underscores the critical role of AI governance as Africa increasingly adopts ChatGPT and similar AI systems. It argues that a comprehensive understanding of AI governance is essential not only for maximising the benefits of generative AI systems but also for facilitating a global dialogue. This dialogue aims to foster shared knowledge and insights between the Global North and the Global South, which is important for the development and creation of inclusive and equitable AI policies and practices that can be beneficial for all regions.
Funder
UKRI Technology Mission Fund
Reference64 articles.
1. ChatGPT Broke the EU Plan to Regulate AI;Volpicelli;Politico,2023
2. Tracy, R. (2023, June 12). Biden Administration Weighs Possible Rules for AI Tools like ChatGPT. Available online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-administration-weighs-possible-rules-for-ai-tools-like-chatgpt-46f8257b.
3. Sheehan, M. (2023). China’s AI Regulations and How They Get Made. Horiz. J. Int. Relat. Sustain. Dev., 108–125.
4. ChatGPT and the Rise of Generative AI: Threat to Academic Integrity?;Eke;J. Responsible Technol.,2023
5. Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., and Shmitchell, S. (2021, January 1). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.