Kierkegaard’s Descriptive Philosophy of Religion: The Imagination Poised between Possibility and Actuality

Author:

Gouwens David J.1

Affiliation:

1. Theology, Brite Divinity School, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA

Abstract

Rethinking the powers of the imagination, Søren Kierkegaard both anticipates and challenges contemporary approaches to a descriptive philosophy of religion. In contrast to the reigning approaches to religion in his day, Kierkegaard reconceives philosophy as, first of all, descriptive of human, including specifically ethical and religious, existence. To this end, he develops conceptual tools, including a descriptive ontology of human existence, a “pluralist epistemology” exploring both cognitive and passional dimensions of religion, and a role for the poetic in philosophy, strikingly expressed in his observer figures who “imaginatively construct” “thought projects” to explore human existence. While this new descriptive account anticipates subsequent approaches to the philosophy of religion, it could be interpreted as another “objectivist” endeavor, yet Kierkegaard attempts more in this descriptive philosophy. He imaginatively deploys conceptual and rhetorical strategies maieutically to both describe and elicit self-reflection aimed at transformation, thus expanding the imagination’s uses for his readers. Comparing Kierkegaard to Pierre Hadot’s recovery of ancient Greek philosophy as “a way of life” will show how Kierkegaard also engages the particularity of “the Christian principle”, with implications for how philosophy can both describe and elicit the pathos of other religious traditions as well.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference42 articles.

1. Hong, H.V., and Hong, E.H. (1985). Philosophical Fragments. Philosophical Fragments and Johannes Climacus, Princeton University Press.

2. Stewart, J. (2016). Henrik Nicolai Clausen: The Voice of Urbane Rationalism. Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, Volume 7, Kierkegaard and His Danish Contemporaries, Tome II: Theology, Routledge.

3. Stewart, J. (2021). Hegel’s Century: Alienation and Recognition in a Time of Revolution, Cambridge University Press.

4. Furtak, R.A. (2010). The Kierkegaardian Ideal of ‘Essential Knowing’ and the Scandal of Modern Philosophy. Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press.

5. Gouwens, D.J. (1989). Kierkegaard’s Dialectic of the Imagination, Peter Lang.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3