Affiliation:
1. Theology, Brite Divinity School, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA
Abstract
Rethinking the powers of the imagination, Søren Kierkegaard both anticipates and challenges contemporary approaches to a descriptive philosophy of religion. In contrast to the reigning approaches to religion in his day, Kierkegaard reconceives philosophy as, first of all, descriptive of human, including specifically ethical and religious, existence. To this end, he develops conceptual tools, including a descriptive ontology of human existence, a “pluralist epistemology” exploring both cognitive and passional dimensions of religion, and a role for the poetic in philosophy, strikingly expressed in his observer figures who “imaginatively construct” “thought projects” to explore human existence. While this new descriptive account anticipates subsequent approaches to the philosophy of religion, it could be interpreted as another “objectivist” endeavor, yet Kierkegaard attempts more in this descriptive philosophy. He imaginatively deploys conceptual and rhetorical strategies maieutically to both describe and elicit self-reflection aimed at transformation, thus expanding the imagination’s uses for his readers. Comparing Kierkegaard to Pierre Hadot’s recovery of ancient Greek philosophy as “a way of life” will show how Kierkegaard also engages the particularity of “the Christian principle”, with implications for how philosophy can both describe and elicit the pathos of other religious traditions as well.
Reference42 articles.
1. Hong, H.V., and Hong, E.H. (1985). Philosophical Fragments. Philosophical Fragments and Johannes Climacus, Princeton University Press.
2. Stewart, J. (2016). Henrik Nicolai Clausen: The Voice of Urbane Rationalism. Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, Volume 7, Kierkegaard and His Danish Contemporaries, Tome II: Theology, Routledge.
3. Stewart, J. (2021). Hegel’s Century: Alienation and Recognition in a Time of Revolution, Cambridge University Press.
4. Furtak, R.A. (2010). The Kierkegaardian Ideal of ‘Essential Knowing’ and the Scandal of Modern Philosophy. Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press.
5. Gouwens, D.J. (1989). Kierkegaard’s Dialectic of the Imagination, Peter Lang.