Affiliation:
1. National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Santiago del Estero 1029, Argentina
Abstract
In this article I attempt to systematically reconstruct Theodor Adorno’s account of the relationship between the processes of authoritarian subject formation and the processes of political formation of the democratic common will. Undertaking a reading that brings Adorno into dialogue with contemporary philosophical perspectives, the paper asks the question of whether it is possible to think of a “democratic We” in nihilistic times. In order to achieve this aim, I will analyze in reverse the modifications that the concept of narcissism has undergone, from Adorno’s use of it to account for the symbolic obstacles to the formation of democratic subjectivities after the Holocaust, to the initial formulations of Freudian psychoanalysis. Finally, I will attempt to outline an affirmative answer to the initial question, formulating the potentials and merits of what I will call a politics of negativity.
Funder
Argentinian National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Reference42 articles.
1. Brown, W. (2023). Nihilistic Times: Thinking with Max Weber, Harvard University Press.
2. Brown, W., Gordon, P., and Pensky, M. (2019). Authoritarianism. Three Inquiries in Critical Theory, UCP.
3. Vogl, J. (2023). Capital and Ressentiment, Polity Press.
4. Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles;Nguyen;Episteme,2020
5. Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism, Polity Press.