Affiliation:
1. Rhodes College, Memphis, TN 38112, USA
Abstract
Gendered criticism of Eve and general criticism of Eve and Adam are rooted in the idea of their moral failing when they disobey Yahweh. Two lenses bring a more ancient understanding of the text into focus. The first lens is reading the story in the context of the J source of the Pentateuch. The second lens is that of natural law as understood by Greco-Roman philosophers. These lenses provide new clarity, showing how Eve and Adam’s decision to eat from the tree of knowledge violates a non-moral norm: they transgress the boundary between humanity and divinity. It is this ontological transgression to which Yahweh responds. Mortality, many labors, and many pregnancies reflect the natural consequences of this ontological violation, not an arbitrary punishment for a moral failing. This alternative understanding of Genesis 2–3 allows us to understand that Eve and Adam are neither cursed nor punished.
Reference36 articles.
1. Baden, Joel (2012). The Composition of the Pentateuch: Renewing the Documentary Hypothesis, Yale University Press.
2. Baden, Joel (2013). The Promise to the Patriarchs, Oxford University Press.
3. Barr, James (1992). The Garden of Eden and the Hope of Immortality: The Read-Tuckwell Lectures for 1990, SCM Press.
4. Barton, John (2014). Ethics in Ancient Israel, Oxford University Press.
5. The Role of Exchange in Ancient Mediterranean Religion and Its Implications for Reading Genesis 18–19;Bolin;Journal for the Study of the Old Testament,2004