Laparoscopic Hartmann Procedure—A Surgery That Still Saves Lives
Author:
Bradea Costel12, Tarcoveanu Eugen1, Munteanu Valentina1, Lupascu Cristian Dumitru12, Andriesi-Rusu Florina Delia12, Ciobanu Delia Gabriela2ORCID, Vasilescu Alin Mihai12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. First Surgical Clinic, “St. Spiridon” Hospital Iasi, Independentei Str., No 1, 700111 Iasi, Romania 2. Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania
Abstract
Background: A Hartmann operation, which is the intervention by which the lower part of the sigmoid and the upper part of the rectum are resected with the closing of the rectal stump and end colostomy, has as its indications: advanced or complicated rectosigmoid neoplasm, moderate biological condition of the patient, peritoneal sepsis, intestinal occlusion and fragile colonic wall, especially in the context of inflammatory changes. The Hartmann procedure can save lives even at the cost of a stoma reversal failure. Methods: The cases operated with the Hartmann procedure by an open approach or laparoscopic approach in our clinic, between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, were admitted in this study and their medical records were reviewed, also making a comparison between the two types of approach. Univariate statistical comparisons but also a multivariate analysis was performed. Results: We performed 985 operations for intestinal and colonic occlusion (7.15% of the total operations in the clinic), 531 (54%) were non-tumor occlusions and 454 (46%) were occlusive tumors (88 Hartmann operations). Of these, 7.3% were laparoscopically performed (7 laparoscopic Hartmann operations and 23 diagnostic laparoscopies). A total of 11 cases (18%) also had colonic perforation. We compared laparoscopic Hartmann with open Hartmann and observed the benefits of laparoscopy for postoperative morbidity and mortality. The presence of pulmonary and cardiac morbidities is associated with the occurrence of general postoperative morbidities, while peritonitis is statistically significantly associated with the occurrence of local complications that are absent after the laparoscopic approach. Conclusions: The Hartmann procedure is still nowadays an operation widely used in emergency situations. Laparoscopy may become standard for the Hartmann procedure and reversal of the Hartmann procedure, but the percentage of laparoscopy remains low due to advanced or complicated colorectal cancer, poor general condition both at the first and second intervention, and the difficulties of reversal of the Hartmann procedure.
Subject
Paleontology,Space and Planetary Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference41 articles.
1. Hartmann’s operation;Rosenman;Am. J. Surg.,1994 2. Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann’s;Banerjee;Colorectal Dis.,2005 3. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer;Heald;Lancet,1986 4. Total Mesorectal Excision, an erroneous anatomical term for the gold standard in rectal cancer treatment;Int. J. Surg.,2015 5. Clementi, M., Pietroletti, R., Carletti, F., Sista, F., Grasso, A., Fiasca, F., Cappelli, S., Balla, A., Rizza, V., and Ciarrocchi, A. (2022). Colostomy Reversal following Hartmann’s Procedure: The Importance of Timing in Short- and Long-Term Complications: A Retrospective Multicentric Study. J. Clin. Med., 11.
|
|