Abstract
The interaction process between farmers’ livelihood and land use is a core link between the interaction and the coupling of the human–land system. It is a complex evolutionary process that involves several issues such as resource-intensive utilization and economic development. This study first constructs a dynamic model of the coupling system of farmers’ livelihood efficiency and land use and designs two types of 31 scenarios based on the farmer’s livelihood mode and land use. This study further simulates the coupling coordination relationship in different scenarios and then proposes suggestions for sustainable development. The findings of our study show that with the development of time, the livelihood capital, livelihood output, and land use level first showed a decline and then an increase. The results also reveal that livelihood efficiency and coordination degree are related to the livelihood mode and land use mode of farmers, while the land use level is not significantly associated with the livelihood mode of farmers. Pure-agriculture farmers have the lowest livelihood efficiency and coordination degree when they have no planting and breeding poultry, while part-time farmers have the highest land use level and coordination degree when they plant cash crops and breeding livestock. Besides, non-agriculture farmers have the highest livelihood efficiency and the lowest land use level when they neither plant crops nor breed livestock. To improve the level of coupling coordination, it is necessary not only to flexibly adjust the farmer’s livelihood and land use mode but also to optimize the allocation of various resources to promote the coordinated and sustainable development of farmers.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Social Science Foundation of China
Science and Technology Innovation Team of Innovative Talent Promotion Plan in Shaanxi Province
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference89 articles.
1. On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth;Apergis;Ecol. Econ.,2010
2. Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment?;Ibrahim;Renew. Energy,2022
3. Framing and reframing questions of human–environment interactions;Harden;Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.,2012
4. Sustainable development and pollution: The effects of CO2 emission on population growth, food production, economic development, and energy consumption in Pakistan;Rehman;Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.,2022
5. The Impacts of Climate Change on the Livelihood and Food Security of Small-Scale Fishers in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe;Muringai;J. Asian Afr. Stud.,2020