Socioeconomic Deprivation and Invasive Breast Cancer Incidence by Stage at Diagnosis: A Possible Explanation to the Breast Cancer Social Paradox

Author:

Borghi Giulio1,Delacôte Claire12ORCID,Delacour-Billon Solenne123,Ayrault-Piault Stéphanie123,Dabakuyo-Yonli Tienhan Sandrine34ORCID,Delafosse Patricia35,Woronoff Anne-Sophie36,Trétarre Brigitte378ORCID,Molinié Florence1238ORCID,Cowppli-Bony Anne1238

Affiliation:

1. Loire-Atlantique/Vendée Cancer Registry, 44093 Nantes, France

2. SIRIC ILIAD INCa-DGOS-INSERM-ITMO Cancer_18011, CHU Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France

3. French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM), 31000 Toulouse, France

4. Côte d’Or Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry, INSERM U1231, 21000 Dijon, France

5. Isère Cancer Registry, 38000 Grenoble, France

6. Doubs Cancer Registry, 25000 Besançon, France

7. Hérault Cancer Registry, 34000 Montpellier, France

8. EQUITY Research Team (Certified by the French League Against Cancer), CERPOP, UMR 1295, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the influence of area-based socioeconomic deprivation on the incidence of invasive breast cancer (BC) in France, according to stage at diagnosis. All women from six mainland French departments, aged 15+ years, and diagnosed with a primary invasive breast carcinoma between 2008 and 2015 were included (n = 33,298). Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was determined using the French version of the European Deprivation Index. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) by socioeconomic deprivation and stage at diagnosis were compared estimating incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age at diagnosis and rurality of residence. Compared to the most affluent areas, significantly lower IRRs were found in the most deprived areas for all-stages (0.85, 95% CI 0.81–0.89), stage I (0.77, 95% CI 0.72–0.82), and stage II (0.84, 95% CI 0.78–0.90). On the contrary, for stages III–IV, significantly higher IRRs (1.18, 95% CI 1.08–1.29) were found in the most deprived areas. These findings provide a possible explanation to similar or higher mortality rates, despite overall lower incidence rates, observed in women living in more deprived areas when compared to their affluent counterparts. Socioeconomic inequalities in access to healthcare services, including screening, could be plausible explanations for this phenomenon, underlying the need for further research.

Funder

SIRIC ILIAD

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3