A Comparison of Different Sample Processing Protocols for MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Formalin-Fixed Multiple Myeloma Cells

Author:

Casadonte Rita1ORCID,Kriegsmann Jörg12,Kriegsmann Mark3ORCID,Kriegsmann Katharina4,Torcasio Roberta56,Gallo Cantafio Maria Eugenia5,Viglietto Giuseppe5,Amodio Nicola5

Affiliation:

1. Proteopath GmbH, 54296 Trier, Germany

2. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500 Krems, Austria

3. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

4. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

5. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

6. Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, Department of Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences (DiBEST), University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy

Abstract

Sample processing of formalin-fixed specimens constitutes a major challenge in molecular profiling efforts. Pre-analytical factors such as fixative temperature, dehydration, and embedding media affect downstream analysis, generating data dependent on technical processing rather than disease state. In this study, we investigated two different sample processing methods, including the use of the cytospin sample preparation and automated sample processing apparatuses for proteomic analysis of multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines using imaging mass spectrometry (IMS). In addition, two sample-embedding instruments using different reagents and processing times were considered. Three MM cell lines fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde were either directly centrifuged onto glass slides using cytospin preparation techniques or processed to create paraffin-embedded specimens with an automatic tissue processor, and further cut onto glass slides for IMS analysis. The number of peaks obtained from paraffin-embedded samples was comparable between the two different sample processing instruments. Interestingly, spectra profiles showed enhanced ion yield in cytospin compared to paraffin-embedded samples along with high reproducibility compared to the sample replicate.

Funder

Italian Association for Cancer Research

Italian Ministry of Health

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference41 articles.

1. Proteomic strategies for biomarker identification: Progress and challenges;Fung;Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther.,2000

2. Proteomics approaches to biomarker detection;Zhou;Brief. Funct. Genom. Proteom.,2005

3. Shotgun proteomics and biomarker discovery;McDonald;Dis. Markers,2002

4. Proteomics in pathology;Casadonte;Proteomics,2018

5. Characterizing peptides in individual mammalian cells using mass spectrometry;Rubakhin;Nat. Protoc.,2007

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3