Abstract
Vascular-disrupting agents (VDAs) have shown a preliminary anti-cancer effect in extracranial tumors; however, the therapeutic potential of VDAs in intracranial metastatic lesions remains unclear. Simultaneous intracranial and extracranial tumors were induced by the implantation of rhabdomyosarcoma in 15 WAG/Rij rats. Pre-treatment characterizations were performed at a 3.0 T clinical magnet including a T2 relaxation map, T1 relaxation map, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI). Shortly afterward, a VDA was intravenously given and MRI scans at 1 h, 8 h, and 24 h after treatment were performed. In vivo findings were further confirmed by postmortem angiography and histopathology staining with H&E, Ki67, and CD31. Before VDA treatment, better perfusion (AUC30: 0.067 vs. 0.058, p < 0.05) and AUC300 value (0.193 vs. 0.063, p < 0.001) were observed in extracranial lesions, compared with intracranial lesions. After VDA treatment, more significant and persistent perfusion deficiency measured by PWI (AUC30: 0.067 vs. 0.008, p < 0.0001) and a T1 map (T1 ratio: 0.429 vs. 0.587, p < 0.05) were observed in extracranial tumors, in contrast to the intracranial tumor (AUC30: 0.058 vs. 0.049, p > 0.05, T1 ratio: 0.497 vs. 0.625, p < 0.05). Additionally, significant changes in the T2 value and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value were observed in extracranial lesions, instead of intracranial lesions. Postmortem angiography and pathology showed a significantly larger H&E-stained area of necrosis (86.2% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.0001), lower CD31 level (42.7% vs. 54.3%, p < 0.05), and lower Ki67 level (12.2% vs. 32.3%, p < 0.01) in extracranial tumors, compared with intracranial lesions. The BBB functioned as a barrier against the delivery of VDA into intracranial tumors and multiparametric MRI may predict the efficacy of VDAs on craniofacial tumors.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging
Oncocidia Ltd, UK; P&R Medical Co., Belgium
CZC Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China
Reference46 articles.
1. Towards updated understanding of brain metastasis;Wang;Am. J. Cancer Res.,2022
2. Epidemiology of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease;Lamba;Neuro. Oncol.,2021
3. Wang, S., Chen, L., Feng, Y., Swinnen, J.V., Jonscher, C., Van Ongeval, C., and Ni, Y. (2022). Heterogeneity of Synchronous Lung Metastasis Calls for Risk Stratification and Prognostic Classification: Evidence from a Population-Based Database. Cancers, 14.
4. Incidence and prognosis of liver metastasis at diagnosis: A pan-cancer population-based study;Wang;Am. J. Cancer Res.,2020
5. Incidence and prognosis of patients with brain metastases at diagnosis of systemic malignancy: A population-based study;Cagney;Neuro. Oncol.,2017