Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Female Breast and Cervical Cancer Screens: A Systematic Review

Author:

Phillips Victoria1,Franco Montoya Daniela2,Adams E. Kathleen1

Affiliation:

1. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

2. College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review published cost-effectiveness analyses of Evidence-Based Interventions (EBIs) recommended by the United States Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) to increase breast and cervical cancer screening. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for prospective cost-effectiveness evaluations of EBIs for breast and cervical cancer screening since 1999. We reviewed studies according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and compared the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs), defined as cost per additional woman screened, adjusted to 2021 USD, within and across EBIs by cancer type. Results: We identified eleven studies meeting our review criteria: nine were breast cancer-focused, one breast and cervical cancer combined, and one cervical only, which together reported twenty-four cost-effectiveness assessments of outreach programs spanning eight EBIs. One-on-one education programs were the most common EBI evaluated. The average ICER across breast cancer studies was USD 545 (standard deviation [SD] = USD 729.3), while that for cervical cancer studies was USD 197 (SD = 186.6. Provider reminder/recall systems for women already linked to formal care were the most cost-effective, with an average ICERs of USD 41.3 and USD 10.6 for breast and cervical cancer, respectively. Conclusions: Variability in ICERs across and within EBIs reflect the population studied, the specific EBI, and study settings, and was relatively high. ICER estimate uncertainty and the potential for program replicability in other settings and with other populations were not addressed. Given these limitations, using existing cost-effectiveness estimates to inform program funding allocations is not warranted at this time. Additional research is needed on outreach programs for cervical cancer and those which serve minority populations for either of the female cancer screens.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference42 articles.

1. American Cancer Society (2021, September 23). Key Statistics for Cervical Cancer. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervical-cancer/about/key-statistics.html.

2. American Cancer Society (2021, September 23). How Common Is Breast Cancer? About Breast Cancer 2021. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html.

3. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society;Fontham;CA A Cancer J. Clin.,2020

4. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society;Oeffinger;JAMA,2015

5. (2023, October 01). Healthy People 2030, Increase the Proportion of Females Who Get Screened for Breast Cancer—C-05. Objectives, Available online: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/cancer/increase-proportion-females-who-get-screened-breast-cancer-c-05.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3