New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors: A Systematic Scoping Review
-
Published:2024-07-18
Issue:14
Volume:13
Page:4199
-
ISSN:2077-0383
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCM
Author:
Nahar Lutfun1, Hagiya Hideharu2ORCID, Gotoh Kazuyoshi3, Asaduzzaman Md3, Otsuka Fumio1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan 3. Department of Bacteriology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Among various carbapenemases, New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamases (NDMs) are recognized as the most powerful type capable of hydrolyzing all beta-lactam antibiotics, often conferring multi-drug resistance to the microorganism. The objective of this review is to synthesize current scientific data on NDM inhibitors to facilitate the development of future therapeutics for challenging-to-treat pathogens. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted a MEDLINE search for articles with relevant keywords from the beginning of 2009 to December 2022. We employed various generic terms to encompass all the literature ever published on potential NDM inhibitors. Results: Out of the 1760 articles identified through the database search, 91 met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. The fractional inhibitory concentration index was assessed using the checkerboard assay for 47 compounds in 37 articles, which included 8 compounds already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States. Time-killing curve assays (14 studies, 25%), kinetic assays (15 studies, 40.5%), molecular investigations (25 studies, 67.6%), in vivo studies (14 studies, 37.8%), and toxicity assays (13 studies, 35.1%) were also conducted to strengthen the laboratory-level evidence of the potential inhibitors. None of them appeared to have been applied to human infections. Conclusions: Ongoing research efforts have identified several potential NDM inhibitors; however, there are currently no clinically applicable drugs. To address this, we must foster interdisciplinary and multifaceted collaborations by broadening our own horizons.
Reference116 articles.
1. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis;Murray;Lancet,2022 2. Tamma, P.D., Aitken, S.L., Bonomo, R.A., Mathers, A.J., van Duin, D., and Clancy, C.J. (2023). Infectious Diseases Society of America 2023 Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis., ciad428. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022, September 06). CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/antimicrobial-resistance/media/pdfs/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf?CDC_AAref_Val. 4. Davies, O.L., and Bennett, S. (2022, September 06). WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics Are Urgently Needed. WHO Newsletters. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed. 5. Carbapenems: Past, present, and future;Endimiani;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,2011
|
|