Affiliation:
1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
2. Centre for Alternative Wastewater Treatment, Fleming College, Lindsay, ON K9V 5E6, Canada
3. Independent Researcher, 4460 Tucana Ct #304, Mississauga, ON L5R 3K9, Canada
Abstract
A demonstration-scale outdoor constructed wetland (CW) wastewater treatment system was evaluated for about two years for its effectiveness in treating septic system effluents. The system included three treatment cells: an anaerobic cell, an aerated cell, and a basic oxygen furnace slag (BOFS)-based phosphorus (P) treatment cell. High removal efficiencies were achieved, with reductions of >99% for PO4-P, >83% for NH3-N, >99% for cBOD5, and >76% for COD, with influent concentrations averaging 6, 48, 63, and 143 mg L−1, respectively. Additionally, pathogens removal were high, with an over 99% decrease in E. coli and total coliform levels. The BOFS cell was critical, elevating effluent pH to 10.9 ± 1.5, which effectively inactivated pathogens. Environmental safety before discharge was ensured by CO2(g) sparging to adjust the pH and a zero-valent iron layer in the BOFS cell to control dissolved metal concentrations. Analytical techniques (FESEM-EDX, FTIR, and XANES) confirmed the formation of Ca carbonate and Ca phosphate on spent BOFS, highlighting their role in the treatment process. This study highlights the potential of integrating complementary technologies in constructed wetlands for sustainable and efficient wastewater management.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grants
Ontario Research Fund—Research Excellence Program
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Lake Simcoe Clean-up Fund of Environment Canada
Ontario Ministry of the Environment
NSERC
NRC
CIHR
University of Saskatchewan
Reference104 articles.
1. (2007). Advanced Wastewater Treatment to Achieve Low Concentration of Phosphorus (Standard No. EPA 910-R-07-002).
2. Subsurface horizontal-flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: The Czech experience;Vymazal;Wetl. Ecol. Manag.,1997
3. Xue, X., Hawkins, T., Schoen, M., Garland, J., and Ashbolt, N. (2016). Comparing the life cycle energy consumption, global warming and eutrophication potentials of several water and waste service options. Water, 8.
4. Controlling Nitrogen and Phosphorous in Wastewater;Basu;Chem. Eng. Prog.,2020
5. Mitigation of eutrophication caused by wastewater discharge: A simulation-based approach;Preisner;Ambio,2020