Abstract
The monthly search volumes for drought were extracted from Google® for South Africa using the Keywordseverywhere.com plugin from January 2004 until June 2022. To identify the potential qualitative drivers for such public interest the following data extracted by the plugin were investigated and analysed: the drought-related keywords, the long-tail keywords similar to drought, and the “people also searched for category” from the South African users. The Google Trends monthly score was extracted for South Africa and the Eastern Cape Province, and specific local municipalities/towns/cities in the province. The aim was to assess the relative significance of the drought interest in comparison to public interest in other search terms. The results of the Kruskal–Wallis analyses of variance by ranks showed that there was a statistically significant difference between individual values of the monthly search volumes for drought in South Africa, as a function of time of data extraction (5 percent level of significance; p-value ≤ 4.7 × 10−14). The monthly search volumes increased with time, which is based on the results of the Mann–Kendall test at a 5 percent level of significance (p-value ≤ 0.0092). Analyses of the Google Trends scores indicate that the relative interest in drought in South Africa and the Eastern Cape Province increased with time between January 2004 and June 2022 (the Mann–Kendall test at a 5 percent level of significance; p-value = 0.0011). The population’s searches for drought were relatively low when compared to other search terms on Google. Drought adaptation of the South African community could be considered a driver of the Google searches for drought, but it is a marginal topic compared to other topics in Google searches. It might be necessary to increase this significance by investigating the “Google-search patterns for droughts” in the areas of Tshikaro, Mafusini, Cofimvaba, and Nxotsheni in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.
Publisher
Weston Medical Publishing
Reference33 articles.
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate change: A threat to human wellbeing and health of the planet. Taking action now can secure our future. 2022. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/2022/02/28/pr-wgii-ar6/. Accessed December 28, 2022.
2. Iheanetu CU, Maguire KA, Moricová V, et al.: Utilitarian qubit, human geography, and pandemic preparedness in the 21st century. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1): 321. DOI: 10.3390/su15010321.
3. Yan C, Tian H, Wan X, et al.: Climate change affected the spatiotemporal occurrence of disasters in China over the past five centuries. R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8: 200731. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.200731.
4. Shi P, Ye T, Wang Y, et al.: Disaster risk science: A geographical perspective and a research framework. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2020; 11: 426-440. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-020-00296-5.
5. United Nations Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR): Poorly planned urban development. 2013. Available at https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/risk-drivers/poorlyplanned-urban-development. Accessed January 8, 2023.