Is E-Voting an Alternative to the Ballot Box? A Field Study in Gaziantep

Author:

Cinkara Muhammet Yusuf1ORCID,Şahan Süleyman2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İLETİŞİM FAKÜLTESİ

Abstract

Recent health risks and the high number of voters make it necessary to produce alternatives to the traditional ballot used in elections. For this purpose, new methods that facilitate the voting process and the advantages provided by technology are evaluated in terms of increasing democratic turnout. The aim of this study is to understand which of the two methods, e-voting and voting at the ballot box, voters would prefer as the dependent variable. Since the dependent variable in the study has two categories, Binary Logistic Regression analysis was applied. Data were collected from 475 respondents living in Gaziantep through a questionnaire on voting method preference. Among the dependent variables, age and gender were not statistically significant in determining the preferences for voting methods of the participants. A relationship was found between education level and voting preferences. It was also observed that the higher the level of education of the voter, the higher the rate of preference for e-voting. The questions measuring the level of political interest were developed in the light of the findings of previous studies. Individuals with high political interest are more likely to vote at the ballot box than via e-voting. Ideological differences also affect the preferences for voting methods of individuals. Considering the data obtained from the study; it can be assumed that e-voting as an alternative voting method will be preferred by voters in Türkiye in the future.

Publisher

Kastamonu University

Reference39 articles.

1. Abeles, M. (2020). Devletin antropolojisi (2 ed.). (N. Ökten, Trans.) Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.

2. Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2004). Kent devletinden imparatorluğa. Ankara: İmge Yayınevi.

3. Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2020). Ulus-Devlet ya da halkın eğemenliği. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.

4. Akbulut, Ö., & Çapık, C. (2022). Çok değişkenli istatiksel analizler için örneklem büyüklüğü. Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları, 25(2), 111-116.

5. Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., & Llewellyn, M. H. (2008). Are Americans confident their ballots are counted? The Journal of Politics, 70(3), 754-766.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3