Simultaneous Optimization of Design and Operating Conditions for RPB-based CO2 Capture Process
Author:
Jung Howoun1, Park NohJin2, Lee Jay H.1
Affiliation:
1. University of Southern California, Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2. GS Engineering and Construction Corp., Carbon Solution Research Team/RIF Tech, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Although global efforts for CO2 capture are underway, large-scale CO2 capture projects still face economic risks and technical challenges. The Rotating Packed Bed (RPB) provides an alternative solution by mitigating location constraints and enabling a gradual increase in the scale of CO2 capture through compact modular sizes. However, the main challenge in RPB-based CO2 capture processes lies in the limited experience with implementing industrial-scale RPB processes. The intricate relationship between RPB unit design, operating conditions, and process performance further complicates the process-level analysis for scale-up. To address these challenges, we propose an optimization-based process design for RPB-based CO2 capture. Leveraging rigorous process modeling and simulation, we aim to make simultaneous decisions on RPB unit design and operating conditions. Ultimately, our goal is to develop a cost-effective and optimal RPB-based CO2 capture process, supported by comprehensive cost evaluations. This modularized and cost-effective approach is expected to facilitate rapid implementation and gradual scale-up, thereby reducing entry barriers to CO2 capture technology for industries.
Reference20 articles.
1. P. H. M. Feron, A. Cousins, K. Jiang, R. Zhai, and M. Garcia, "An update of the benchmark post-combustion CO2-capture technology," Fuel, vol. 273, pp. 117776, 2020/08/01/, 2020. 2. S. Chen, J. Liu, Q. Zhang, F. Teng, and B. C. McLellan, "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 167, pp. 112537, 2022/10/01/, 2022. 3. N. Chamchan, J.-Y. Chang, H.-C. Hsu, J.-L. Kang, D. S. H. Wong, S.-S. Jang, and J.-F. Shen, "Comparison of rotating packed bed and packed bed absorber in pilot plant and model simulation for CO2 capture," Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 73, pp. 20-26, 2017/04/01/, 2017. 4. M. S. Jassim, G. Rochelle, D. Eimer, and C. Ramshaw, "Carbon Dioxide Absorption and Desorption in Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solutions in a Rotating Packed Bed," Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2823-2833, 2007/04/01, 2007. 5. C.-H. Yu, H.-H. Cheng, and C.-S. Tan, "CO2 capture by alkanolamine solutions containing diethylenetriamine and piperazine in a rotating packed bed," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 9, pp. 136-147, 2012/07/01/, 2012.
|
|