Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: Another reason to switch to TG-51-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: Another reason to switch to TG-51

Published:2003-03 Issue:2 Volume:4 Page:124-131
ISSN:1526-9914
Container-title:Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Author:

Followill David S.¹,Hanson William F.¹,Ibbott Geoffrey S.¹,Eglezopoulos Leon R.²,Chui Chen-Shou³

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas 77030

2. IBA; 3150 Stage Post Drive, Suite 110 Bartlett Tennessee 38133

3. Department of Medical Physics; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; 1275 York Avenue New York New York 10021

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation

Reference26 articles.

1. Calibration instrumentation used by the AAPM radiological physics center;Grant;Med. Phys.,1976

2. Absorbed dose measurements using parallel plate polystyrene ionization chambers in polystyrene phantoms;Holt;Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys.,1979

3. Protocol for the dosimetry of x- and gamma-ray beams with maximum energies between 0.6 and 50 MeV;SCRAD: Subcommittee on Radiation Dosimetry, American Association of Physicists in Medicine;Phys. Med. Biol.,1979

4. ICRU21: International Commission on Radiation Units “Radiation dosimetry: electrons with initial energies between 1 and 50 Mev,” 1972

5. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams;American Association of Physicists in Medicine, RTC Task Group 21;Med. Phys.,1983