Author:
Loch Vivian do Carmo,Celentano Danielle,Carvalho Saraiva Raysa Valeria,T. Alvarado Swanni,De Freitas Berto Flávia,Tayllon Serra Raymony,Castro Barroso João,Awa Guajá Tatuxa'a,Xavier Rousseau Guillaume
Abstract
Amazon deforestation damages nature, people, and their closer biocultural relationship, eroding fundamental elements for its reproduction. The recognition and use of traditional knowledge to plan and implement restoration efforts are essential to its success. This study identified forest tree species of biocultural value for indigenous communities, quilombolas, and settled farmers in Maranhão state, eastern Brazilian Amazon. Semi-structured interviews, informal conversations, Free Lists, and guided walks were carried out in three different landscapes to identify species with ecological importance and/or use-value according to local communities’ perceptions. Eight categories of species use were defined (food, woody, medicinal, income, cultural, hunting, honey, and energy); and the Smith Salience Index (S) was utilized to identify species with higher importance. A total of 58 native trees (S > 0.1) were listed as biocultural species, five of which were cited for ecological importance only, without a use-value associated. The highest number of species with cultural salience (S > 0.1) was reported in the indigenous group (47), followed by settlers (11) and quilombolas (9). Among the indigenous, we identified a higher number of uses for the same species, and a remarkable spiritual relationship with plants from their cosmological vision. The reproduction of biocultural values in societies needs to receive more attention in the restoration science and praxis. The identification of species of biocultural value can serve as an important ally for the assertive design of conservation and restoration initiatives.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual da Paraiba/Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Ethnobiology and Conservation)
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Plant Science,Anthropology,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology
Reference78 articles.
1. Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (2014). Methods and techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. Springer Protocols Handbooks, New York
2. Allen AE, Santana-Michel FJ, Arrona CO, Zedler JB (2010). Integrating Ecological and Ethnobotanical Priorities into Riparian Restoration. Ecological Restoration 28: 377-388
3. Almeida GMA, Ramos MA, Araújo EL, Baldauf C, Albuquerque UP (2016). Human perceptions of landscape change: The case of a monodominant forest of Attalea speciosa Mart ex. Spreng (Northeast Brazil). Ambio 45:458-467
4. Almeida AS, Vieira ICG (2010). Centro de endemismo Belém: status da vegetação remanescente e desafios para a conservação da biodiversidade e restauração ecológica. Revista de Estudos Universitários 36: 95-111.
5. Amaral DD, Vieira ICG, Almeida SS, Salomão RP, Silva ASL, Jardim MAG (2009). Checklist da flora arbórea de remanescentes florestais da região metropolitana de Belém e valor histórico dos fragmentos, Pará, Brasil. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Ciências Naturais 4: 231-289
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献