Hydropower Scheduling Toolchains: Comparing Experiences in Brazil, Norway, and USA and Implications for Synergistic Research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Hydropower Scheduling Toolchains: Comparing Experiences in Brazil, Norway, and USA and Implications for Synergistic Research

Published:2023-07 Issue:7 Volume:149 Page:
ISSN:0733-9496
Container-title:Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.

Author:

Helseth Arild¹^ORCID,Melo Albert C. G.²,Ploussard Quentin M.³^ORCID,Mo Birger⁴,Maceira Maria E. P.²,Botterud Audun⁵,Voisin Nathalie⁶^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SINTEF Energy Research, Energy Systems Division, Trondheim 7041, Norway (corresponding author). ORCID: .

2. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22290-160, Brazil.

3. Argonne National Laboratory, Energy Systems Division, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439. ORCID:

4. SINTEF Energy Research, Energy Systems Division, Trondheim 7041, Norway.

5. Argonne National Laboratory, Energy Systems Division, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Decisions and Information Systems, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139.

6. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352; Univ. of Washington, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seattle, WA 98195. ORCID:

Publisher

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development,Civil and Structural Engineering

Link

https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5911

Reference68 articles.

1. Aasgård E. K. 2018. “Coordinated hydropower bidding in the day-ahead and balancing market.” In Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Hydro Scheduling in Competitive Electricity Markets edited by A. Helseth. Cham Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03311-8_3.

2. Performance of multi-scenario equivalent hydropower models

3. Botnen, O. J., A. Ohannesen, A. Haugstad, S. Kroken, and O. Frøystein. 1992. “Modelling of hydropower scheduling in a national/international context.” In Hydropower, edited by B. E. Balkema and D. Lysne, 92. Berlin: Springer.

4. Botterud A. C. O’Reilley and A. Somani. 2021. “Valuing flexibility in evolving electricity markets: Current status and future outlook for hydropower.” IEA Hydro Annex IX White Paper IEA Hydropower. Paris: International Energy Agency.

5. Bureau of Reclamation. 2021. “Colorado River Basin secure water act section 9503(c).” Accessed April 24 2023. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Approximating hydropower systems by feasibility spaces in stochastic dual dynamic programming;Electric Power Systems Research;2024-09

2. Multi-scale impacts of climate change on hydropower for long-term water-energy planning in the contiguous United States;Environmental Research Letters;2024-08-22

3. Comparing the Performance of Three-Parameter Weibull and Lognormal Distributions in the Generation of Energy Inflows Synthetic Scenarios;2024 18th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS);2024-06-24

4. Using ProdRisk–SHOP Simulator for Investment Decisions of Solar and Hydro Hybridization;2024 20th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM);2024-06-10

5. Multifractal Analysis of the Brazilian Electricity Market;IEEE Access;2023