1. Cimorelli, A.J.; Perry, S.G.; Venkatram, A.; Weil, J.C.; Paine, R.J.; Wilson, R.B.; Lee, R.F.; Peters, W.D.; Brode, R.W.; Paumier, J.O. AERMOD: Description of Model Formulation; EPA-454/R-03-004; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2005.
2. Gesser, R.A. An Assessment of Potential PSD Increment Consumption Violations due to the Transition of Preferred Regulatory Model. In Guideline on Air Quality Models: the Path Forward; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003; pp 345–354.
3. Long, G.E.; Cordova, J.F.; Tanrikulu, S. An Analysis of AERMOD Sensitivity to Input Parameters in the San Francisco Bay Area. In Proceedings of the 13th Joint Conference on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air & Waste Management Association; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2004; pp 203–206.
4. Long, D.J. Comparison of the Performance of AERMOD and ISC on Elevated Point Sources. In Proceedings of the Air & Waste Management Association’s Annual Conference and Exhibition; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2004; pp 597–613.
5. Tarde, J.A.; Westbrook, J.A. Air Quality Modeling in a Highly Industrialized Valley Regime: a Comparison of AERMOD-PRIME to ISCST-PRIME and ISCST3 Results for PM10 Emissions. In Guideline on Air Quality Models: the Path Forward; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003; 109–119.