1. Arctic Pollution, 2006, Acidification and Arctic Haze; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: Oslo, Norway, 2006.
2. Jakus P.; McGuinness M.; Krupnick, A. The Benefits and Costs of Fish Consumption Advisories for Mercury in the Chesapeake Bay. Resources for the Future; Discussion Paper 02-55; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 2002; available at http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-DP-02-55.pdf.
3. Kjellstrom, T.; Kennedy, P.; Wallis, S.; Mantell, C. Physical and Mental Development of Children with Prenatal Exposure to Mercury from Fish. Stage I: Preliminary Tests at Age 4; Report 3080; National Swedish Environmental Protection Board: Solna, Sweden, 1986.
4. UNEP Report on a General Qualitative Assessment of the Potential Costs and Benefits Associated with Each of the Strategic Objectives Set out in Annex 1 of the Report of the First Meeting of the Open Ended Working Group; U.N. Environmental Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008; available at http://www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/OEWG2/documents/e5)/English/OEWG_2_5_REV1.pdf (accessed 2009).
5. Pacyna, J.M.; Munthe, J.; Wilson, S. Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment: Sources, Emissions and Transport; U.N. Environmental Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008