Perception of Curability Among Advanced Cancer Patients: An International Collaborative Study

Author:

Yennurajalingam Sriram1,Rodrigues Luis Fernando2,Shamieh Omar3,Tricou Colombe4,Filbet Marilène4,Naing Kyaw5,Ramaswamy Akhileshwaran5,Perez-Cruz Pedro Emilio6,Bautista Mary Jocelyn S.7,Bunge Sofia8,Muckaden Mary Ann9,Sewram Vikash10,Fakrooden Sarah11,Noguera-Tejedor Antonio12,Rao Shobha S.13,Liu Diane14,Park Minjeong1,Williams Janet L.1,Lu Zhanni1,Cantu Hilda1,Hui David1,Reddy Suresh K.1,Bruera Eduardo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Barretos, Brazil

2. Médico da Unidade de Cuidados Paliativos, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil

3. Palliative Care Department, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan

4. Centre de soins palliatifs entre Hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

5. HCA Hospice Care, Singapore

6. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

7. Pain Management and Palliative Care Unit Benavides Cancer Institute, Manila, Philippines

8. Programa Argentino De Medicina, Olavaria, Argentina

9. Department of Palliative Care Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

10. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Capetown, South Africa

11. Highway Hospice, Durban, South Africa

12. Hospital Centro de Cuidados Laguna, Madrid, Spain

13. Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care LBJ Hospital, Houston, TX

14. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Abstract

Abstract Background There are limited data on illness understanding and perception of cure among advanced cancer patients around the world. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency and factors associated with inaccurate perception of curability among advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care across the globe. Materials and Methods Secondary analysis of a study to understand the core concepts in end-of-life care among advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care from 11 countries across the world. Advanced cancer patients were surveyed using a Patient Illness Understanding survey and Control Preference Scale. Descriptive statistics and multicovariate logistic regression analysis were performed. Results Fifty-five percent (763/1,390) of patients receiving palliative care inaccurately reported that their cancer is curable. The median age was 58, 55% were female, 59% were married or had a partner, 48% were Catholic, and 35% were college educated. Sixty-eight percent perceived that the goal of therapy was “to get rid of their cancer,” and 47% perceived themselves as “seriously ill.” Multicovariate logistic regression analysis shows that accurate perception of curability was associated with female gender (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, p = .027), higher education (OR 0.37, p < .0001), unemployment status (OR 0.69, p = .02), and being from France (OR 0.26, p < .0001) and South Africa (OR 0.52, p = .034); inaccurate perception of curability was associated with better Karnofsky performance status (OR 1.02 per point, p = .0005), and being from Philippines (OR 15.49, p < .0001), Jordan (OR 8.43, p < .0001), Brazil (OR 2.17, p = .0037), and India (OR 2.47, p = .039). Conclusion Inaccurate perception of curability in advanced cancer patients is 55% and significantly differs by gender, education, performance status, employment status, and country of origin. Further studies are needed to develop strategies to reduce this misperception of curability in advanced cancer patients. Implications for Practice The findings of this study indicate that inaccurate perception of curability among advanced cancer patients is 55%. Inaccurate perception of curability significantly differs by gender, education, performance status, employment status, and country of origin. There is great need to facilitate improved patient–physician communication so as to improve health care outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3