Affiliation:
1. Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
2. Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine
3. Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for 3 B. Sukharevskaya Sq., Moscow, 107045
4. N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine
5. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Abstract
RATIONALE Hollow organ perforation is an urgent problem in abdominal surgery. According to the literature, the incidence of perforation is from 0.37% to 2.3% of cases among various acute surgical pathologies of the abdominal organs. The greatest attention in the literature is paid to the problem of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. At the same time, a much smaller number of publications, both Russia and foreign, are devoted to other, more rare types of perforations. This situation is most likely explained by the low prevalence of other types of perforations, which, in turn, does not make them a less urgent problem in emergency surgery, which requires a modern approach to the treatment of this group of patients.PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Analysis of domestic and foreign literature on the diagnosis and treatment of rare types of benign intestinal perforations.MATERIAL AND METHODS A literature review was performed for the period from 1994 to 2020 in Russian and in English, available on Pubmed, Medline, Springer, Scopus, E-library, on topics such as perforated diverticula of the small intestine, perforation of Meckel’s diverticulum, perforated ulcers of the small intestine, perforation of the intestine by a foreign body. RESUltS With all the variety of surgical techniques for various types of perforation of the gastrointestinal tract, currently in the literature there are no specific criteria for choosing a particular method of intervention with regard to the cause, level, and duration of perforation.CONCLUSION The lack of unified approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rare GIT perforations dictates the need for a more in-depth study of this issue in order to apply and optimize the technique of videolaparoscopic approach, develop a treatment and diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected perforations of the gastrointestinal tract using the video laparoscopic method.
Publisher
The Scientific and Practical Society of Emergency Medicine Physicians
Reference80 articles.
1. Yudin VA, Kochukov VP, Melnikov AA, Melnikova IA, Mokrova AV. Surgical Approaches in Diagnostics and Treatment of Perforation Jejunal Diverticulosis. Surgical practice. 2017;(3):43–45. (in Russ.)
2. Zdzitovetsky DE, Beloborodov AA, Danilina EP, Borisov RN, Tyapkin SI. Diverticular Disease of the Small Intestine with Perforation and Developing a Disseminated Purulent Peritonitis. Siberian Medical Review. 2013;(6):76–78. (in Russ.)
3. Gurala D, Idiculla PS, Patibandla P, Philipose J, Krzyzak M, Mukherjee I. Perforated Jejunal Diverticulitis. Case Reports. 2019;13(3):521–525. PMID: 31911765 https://doi.org/10.1159/000503896eCollection 2019 Sep-Dec.
4. Schnueriger B, Vorburger SA, Banz VM, Schoepfer AM, Candinas D. Diagnosis and management of the symptomatic duodenal diverticulum: a case series and a short review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(9):1571–1576. PMID: 18521693 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0549-0
5. Rangan V, Lamont JT. Small Bowel Diverticulosis: Pathogenesis, Clinical Management, and New Concepts. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22(1):4. PMID: 31940112 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-019-0741-2