Performance of the Aldosterone to Renin Ratio as a Screening Test for Primary Aldosteronism

Author:

Hung Annie1,Ahmed Sumaiya1,Gupta Ankur2ORCID,Davis Alexandra3,Kline Gregory A4,Leung Alexander A45ORCID,Ruzicka Marcel6,Hiremath Swapnil6ORCID,Hundemer Gregory L6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

2. Department of Medicine (Division of Nephrology), Whakatane Hospital, Whakatane, New Zealand

3. Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, Ottawa, ON,  Canada

4. Department of Medicine (Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

5. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

6. Department of Medicine (Division of Nephrology) and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON,  Canada

Abstract

Abstract Context The aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) is the guideline-recommended screening test for primary aldosteronism. However, there are limited data in regard to the diagnostic performance of the ARR. Objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ARR as a screening test for primary aldosteronism. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases until February 2020. Observational studies assessing ARR diagnostic performance as a screening test for primary aldosteronism were selected. To limit verification bias, only studies where dynamic confirmatory testing was implemented as a reference standard regardless of the ARR result were included. Study-level data were extracted and risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results Ten studies, involving a total of 4110 participants, were included. Potential risk of bias related to patient selection was common and present in half of the included studies. The population base, ARR positivity threshold, laboratory assay, and reference standard for confirmatory testing varied substantially between studies. The reported ARR sensitivity and specificity varied widely with sensitivity ranging from 10% to 100% and specificity ranging from 70% to 100%. Notably, 3 of the 10 studies reported an ARR sensitivity of <50%, suggesting a limited ability of the ARR to adequately identify patients with primary aldosteronism. Conclusions ARR performance varied widely based on patient population and diagnostic criteria, especially with respect to sensitivity. Therefore, no single ARR threshold for interpretation could be recommended. Limitations in accuracy and reliability of the ARR must be recognized in order to appropriately inform clinical decision-making.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes

Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) Program New Investigator Award

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3