Plasma Metanephrines Yield Fewer False-Positive Results Than Urine Metanephrines in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Abstract

Abstract Context Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with increased nocturnal sympathetic activity. In OSA patients, elevations in metanephrines may lead to false-positive tests when evaluating for pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma (PPGL). Objective To evaluate whether morning plasma metanephrines would lead to fewer false-positive results than 24-hour urinary metanephrines in OSA patients. Methods Patients undergoing polysomnography for suspected OSA were recruited. Plasma free and 24-hour urinary metanephrines were measured by HPLC-MS/MS. Patients with elevated levels had repeat measurements, abdominal imaging, and follow-up to diagnose or exclude a PPGL. Results Seventy-six patients completed polysomnography and biochemical testing; 68 (89.5%) patients had OSA, of whom 19 (27.9%) had elevated plasma and/or urinary metanephrines. On follow-up, one patient had a bladder paraganglioma, while PPGL was excluded in the remaining patients. OSA patients had more false-positive urinary metanephrines (17 of 67, 25.4%) than plasma metanephrines (2 of 67, 3.0%), P < .01, and this was more common in severe OSA (13 of 34, 38.2%), compared to moderate/mild OSA (4 of 33, 12.1%), P < .01. Both plasma and urinary metanephrines decreased after treatment with continuous positive airway pressure. On multivariable analysis, severe OSA, obesity, and family history of hypertension were positive predictors for false-positive urinary metanephrines in patients with suspected OSA. Conclusion In OSA patients, plasma metanephrines are less likely to yield false-positive results for the diagnosis of PPGL than 24-hour urinary metanephrines. In patients with suspected OSA, obesity, or a family history of hypertension, plasma metanephrines may be the preferred first-line test to avoid unnecessary anxiety or follow-up.