Bored participants, biased data? How boredom can influence behavioral science research and what we can do about it

Author:

Meier MariaORCID,Martarelli CorinnaORCID,Wolff Wanja

Abstract

When studying affect, cognition, and behavior, scientists often use “artificial tasks in sensory and socially deprived environments” (Shamay-Tsoory & Mendelsohn, 2019). While such settings maximize experimental control, they might introduce confounds that systematically alter participant behavior. In the worst case, such confounds could lead to biased study outcomes and even wrong inferences. Due to the way prototypical research settings are designed, one confound that is very likely to occur is boredom, a sensation whose effect on human affect, cognition, and behavior has been shown in numerous studies (Jangraw et al., 2023; Raffaelli et al., 2018). In this comment, we draw upon theoretical and empirical evidence to make the case that a) participants tend to be bored while taking part in studies, b) the degree of boredom differs as a function of inter-individual differences in trait boredom, c) boredom can impair participants’ attention, can make study participation more effortful, and can increase the urge to do something else (i.e., to disengage from the study). Most importantly, we argue that some participants might adjust their behavior because they are bored, and that this might bias study outcomes. Our comment is data-supported: Substantiating these theory-driven propositions, we present data that support the claim for the (unintended) role of boredom in behavioral science research. To this end, we surveyed two samples drawn from the population of participants that provide the backbone for many results from behavioral science research: University students (n = 113) and paid online workers (n = 419). Across both samples, boredom was reported as a corollary of study participation, and 53% of the participants think that – based on their personal experiences as participants to studies – study outcomes are altered due to boredom. Taken together, we provide conceptual and empirical support for the hypothesis that boredom can be an unaccounted confound in behavioral science research. Building on this, we provide a set of recommendations on how to control for (and deal with) the occurrence and effects of boredom in behavioral science research.

Publisher

Center for Open Science

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3