Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England

Author:

Al-Sarira A A12,David G1,Willmott S3,Slavin J P1,Deakin M24,Corless D J1

Affiliation:

1. Leighton Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire NHS Trust, Crewe, UK

2. Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK

3. Research and Development Office, Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire NHS Trust, Crewe, UK

4. Department of Surgery, University Hospital North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background The 2001 UK National Health Service guidance on improving outcomes recommended centralization of oesophageal resection. The aim of this study was to analyse national trends in oesophageal resection in England to determine whether centralization has occurred and its impact on outcomes. Methods The study used data from Hospital Episode Statistics for 1997–1998 to 2003–2004 and included patients who had resection for oesophageal cancer. The annual hospital volume was grouped into five categories based on the recommendation for annual volume for a designated centre. Results A total of 11 838 oesophageal resections were performed. The total number of hospitals performing resections decreased, mainly owing to a fall in the number of very low-volume hospitals (117 in 1997 to 45 in 2003). The proportion of resections performed in very high-volume hospitals increased from 17·8 per cent during 1997–1999 to 21·9 per cent during 2002–2003 (P < 0·001). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10·1 per cent, with a significant reduction over time (from 11·7 to 7·6 per cent; P < 0·001). The decline in mortality rate may be due to increased numbers of patients undergoing surgery in higher-volume hospitals. There was an increase in the annual number of new patients from 5672 to 6230 during the study, although a fall in the proportion of resections from 31·5 to 26·0 per cent (P < 0·001). Conclusion Centralization and multidisciplinary team expertise partly explain the improvement in mortality rate, but changes in preoperative selection also play a part.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 59 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3