Distress related to psychotic experiences: Enhancing the world health organization composite international diagnostic interview psychosis screen

Author:

Oh Hans1ORCID,Karcher Nicole R.2ORCID,Soffer‐Dudek Nirit3ORCID,Koyanagi Ai4ORCID,Besecker Megan1,DeVylder Jordan E.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Suzanne Dworak Peck School of Social Work University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

2. Washington University St. Louis Missouri USA

3. Department of Psychology Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev Beer‐Sheva Israel

4. Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu Sant Boi de Llobregat Spain

5. Fordham University Graduate School of Social Service New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe abbreviated version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) psychosis screen tends to yield high prevalence in online samples. Psychotic Experiences (PE) may not necessarily indicate current or imminent psychopathology; however, distressing PE appear to be more clinically informative.MethodsWe analyzed data collected from an online survey administered to a Qualtrics panel (N = 2522 adults). Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between PE (with and without associated distress) and several mental health outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, and race/ethnicity.ResultsIndividuals with distressing PE had greater odds of most mental health outcomes when compared with individuals with non‐distressing PE. This was true for being in mental health treatment, loneliness, probable mental illness, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt, adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education level. The only exception was for hazardous alcohol use, for which there was no significant association with distressing PE.ConclusionAs screening for PE gains traction in public health and preventive medicine, using an abbreviated version of the WHO CIDI psychosis screen may be clinically informative, especially when eliciting the distressful nature of PE.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3