A comparative study of the image quality of dermoscopic images acquired in general practice versus at a dermatology department

Author:

Niklasson Louise1ORCID,Prasad Sumangali Chandra1,Schuster Annette1,Laurinaviciene Rasa1,Vestergaard Tine12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

2. OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSkin cancer constitutes a significant and growing disease burden. To deal with this, teledermoscopy (TDS) can be useful. However, image quality is a concern for implementing TDS. High image quality can be obtained at a dermatology department, but in many occasions, it is more sensible to acquire TDS images in general practice.ObjectivesTo compare image quality, diagnostic confidence, suggested management, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy between two sets of dermoscopic images of the same skin tumour, where one set was acquired in general practice, and the other was obtained at a dermatology department.MethodsTwo sets of dermoscopic images of 192 skin lesions were evaluated by the same dermatologist at two different occasions approximately 4 years apart (2018 vs. 2022). On both occasions, the images were evaluated in regard to image quality, diagnostic confidence, whether the lesion was a benign or malignant, primary diagnosis and suggested management.ResultsThere were statistically significant differences of diagnostic confidence and suggested management (p = 0.00 for respective parameter), but not for image quality (p = 0.37), sensitivity (p = 0.67), specificity (p = 0.66) and diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.81). The intraobserver agreements were slight for image quality (κ = 0.012), fair for diagnostic confidence (κ = 0.313) and moderate for suggested management (κ = 0.467).ConclusionsThe image quality of both sets of dermoscopic images was most often good. Although we did not find a statistically significant difference in image quality between the two sets of images, our minimal level of intraobserver agreement suggests otherwise. However, this should not hinder TDS image acquisition in general practice as our results indicate that with the availability of referral notes, TDS images taken in general practice can achieve a similar sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy as dermoscopic images obtained at a dermatology department.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3