A planning strategy may reduce the risk of heart diseases and radiation pneumonia: Avoiding the specific heart substructures

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDose to heart substructures is a better predictor for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than mean heart dose (MHD). We propose an avoidance planning strategy for important cardiac substructures.Material and methodsTwo plans, clinical and cardiac substructure‐avoidance plan, were generated for twenty patients. Five dose‐sensitive substructures, including left ventricle, pulmonary artery, left anterior descending branch, left circumflex branch and the coronary artery were chosen. The avoidance plan aims to meet the target criteria and organ‐at‐risk (OARs) constraints while minimizing the dose parameters of the above five substructures. The dosimetric assessments included the mean dose and the maximum dose of cardiac substructures and several volume parameters. In addition, we also evaluated the relative risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic heart failure (CHF), and radiation pneumonia (RP).ResultsPearson correlation coefficient and R2 value of linear regression fitting demonstrated that MHD had poor prediction ability for the mean dose of the cardiac substructures. Compared to clinical plans, an avoidance plan is able to statistically significantly decrease the dose to key substructures. Meanwhile, the dose to OARs and the coverage of the target are comparable in the two plans. In addition, it can be observed that the avoidance plan statistically decreases the relative risks of CAD, CHF, and RP.ConclusionsThe substructure‐avoidance planning strategy that incorporates the cardiac substructures into optimization process, can protect the important heart substructures, such as left ventricle, left anterior descending branch and pulmonary artery, achieving the substantive sparing of dose‐sensitive cardiac structures, and have the potential to decrease the relative risks of CAD, CHF, and RP.