Utilization of rehabilitation services in violent versus non‐violent traumatic spinal cord injury

Author:

Barnett Heather M.1ORCID,Wilson Josh M.1,Kunapaisal Thitikan2,Nehra Deepika3,Vavilala Monica S.2,Hoffman Jeanne M.1,Crane Deborah A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA

3. Department of Surgery University of Washington Seattle WA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionViolence is the third leading cause of spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States, and people with violence‐related SCI have worse long‐term outcomes compared to other traumatic SCI etiologies. Little is known, however, about the underlying reasons for these differences. Access to and utilization of rehabilitation services may differ in this population, but their outpatient care has not been previously investigated.ObjectiveTo evaluate differences in utilization patterns of outpatient rehabilitation services between people with violence‐related SCI and other traumatic SCI etiologies.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAcademic tertiary care hospital systemPatients41 patients with violence‐related SCI residing in King County at the time of injury who completed inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) in our institution were identified from the hospital trauma registry and matched with 41 control patients with non‐violent traumatic SCI.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome Measure(s)The number of appointments attended, canceled, and missed during the first year after discharge from IPR were obtained by chart review for Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R) physicians and therapy services.ResultsPeople with violence‐related SCI had decreased follow‐up with outpatient rehabilitation services after IPR discharge compared to non‐violent traumatic SCI, including PM&R (2.50±2.44 vs. 3.76±2.21 visits, β=‐1.28, p=0.017), physical therapy (8.91±11.02 vs. 17.57±15.26, β=‐9.79, p=0.0093), occupational therapy (4.28±7.90 vs. 10.04±14.42, β=‐6.18, p=0.033), and recreational therapy (0.293±0.955 vs. 1.37±2.86, β=‐1.07, p=0.035). The rate of missed appointments was also higher among people with violence‐related SCI compared to controls for PM&R (25.2%±28.5% vs. 9.9%±16.5%, β=14.6%, p=0.014) and physical therapy (26.0%±32.0% vs 4.2%±13.2%, β=22.1%, p=0.009).ConclusionsIndividuals with violence‐related SCI were less likely to attend follow up appointments with PM&R physicians and other allied health professionals and were more likely to miss scheduled appointments compared to other traumatic SCI etiologies. Decreased outpatient follow‐up may affect long‐term outcomes for people with violence‐related SCI.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3