Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Law and Business & EM Strasbourg Business School University of Strasbourg Strasbourg France
Abstract
AbstractWe study how language affects private debt renegotiation. We predict that stronger future time reference (FTR) languages alter the importance of renegotiation risk by lowering the perceived value of loan renegotiation. We test this hypothesis on a sample of 6500 loans issued to European firms between 1999 and 2017. We find that the use of a stronger FTR language decreases the likelihood of renegotiation and the number of renegotiation rounds. These findings are robust to several FTR proxies, various specifications including loan, borrower, and country‐level variables, and potential mitigation effects from specific loan, country, or time effects. They suggest that linguistic structure influences the renegotiation process of private debt contracts.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference69 articles.
1. An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting;Aghion P.;Review of Economic Studies,1992
2. Does trust matter for the cost of bank loans?;Álvarez‐Botas C.;Journal of Corporate Finance,2021
3. Languages and future‐oriented economic behavior—Experimental evidence for causal effects;Ayres I.;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2023
4. Creditor rights, enforcement, and bank loans;Bae K.;Journal of Finance,2009
5. Mind the gap: The difference between U.S. and European loan rates;Berg T.;The Review of Financial Studies,2017