Global disparities in cancer supportive care: An international survey

Author:

Chan Alexandre12ORCID,Eng Lawson3,Jiang Changchuan4ORCID,Dagsi Mary1,Ke Yu2,Tanay Mary5,Bergerot Cristiane6,Dixit Niharika7,Gutiérrez Ana Cardeña8ORCID,Velazquez Ana I.9ORCID,Islami Farhad10,Soto‐Perez‐de‐Celis Enrique1112

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences University of California Irvine Irvine USA

2. National Cancer Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore

3. Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

4. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

5. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London London UK

6. Oncoclinicas Brasilia DF Brazil

7. University of California, San Francisco/Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital San Francisco California USA

8. Medical Oncology Department Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Santa Cruz de Tenerife Spain

9. University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center San Francisco California USA

10. Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society Atlanta Georgia USA

11. Department of Geriatrics Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán Mexico City Mexico

12. Division of Medical Oncology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe global cancer burden is rising, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC), highlighting a critical research gap in understanding disparities in supportive care access. To address this, the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Health Disparities Committee initiated a global survey to investigate and delineate these disparities. This study aims to explore and compare supportive care access disparities between LMIC and High‐Income Countries (HIC).MethodsAn online cross‐sectional survey was conducted among active members of MASCC. Members, representing diverse healthcare professions received email invitations. The survey, available for 3 weeks, comprised sections covering (1) sociodemographic information; (2) clinical service/practice‐related disparities in their region/nation; (3) population groups facing disparities within their region or country. Chi‐squared or Fisher's exact test for cross‐sectional analyses, and a multivariable logistic regression model was employed for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 218 active members participated, with one‐quarter (26.6%) from LMIC and 18.4% ethnic minorities, timely cancer care (43.7%) and timely supportive care (45.0%) emerged as the most pressing disparities globally. Notably, participants from LMIC underscored cancer drug affordability (56.4%) and supportive care guideline implementation (56.4%) as critical issues. Economically disadvantaged populations were noted as more likely to face disparities by both LMIC and HIC (non‐US‐based) respondents, while US‐based respondents identified racial/ethnic minorities as facing more disparities.ConclusionThis global survey reveals significant disparities in cancer supportive care between LMIC and HIC, with a particular emphasis on medication affordability and guideline implementation in LMIC. Addressing these disparities requires targeted intervention, considering specific regional priorities.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference36 articles.

1. Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability‐adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. JAMA;Global Burden of Disease Cancer C;Oncologia,2022

2. Supportive care in cancer—a MASCC perspective

3. Supportive-expressive group therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: survival and psychosocial outcome from a randomized controlled trial

4. Early Interdisciplinary Supportive Care in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

5. Early Palliative Care for Patients with Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3