Affiliation:
1. Center for General Education Teikyo University Tokyo Japan
2. Faculty of Letters Keio University Tokyo Japan
3. Policy Research The Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research Tokyo Japan
4. Graduate School of Letters Keio University Tokyo Japan
Abstract
AbstractWhile data sharing has received research interest in recent times, its real status remains unclear, owing to its ambiguous concept. To understand the current status of data sharing, this study examined primary reuse, data integration, and dataset release as the actual practices of data sharing. A total of 963 articles, chosen from those published in 2018 and registered in the Web of Science global citation database, were manually checked. Existing data were reused in the mode of data integration (13.3%) as frequently as they were for the mode of primary reuse (12.1%). Dataset release was the least common mode (9.0%). The results show the variation in data sharing and indicate the need for standardization of data description in articles based on thorough registration and expansion in public data archives to close the loop that results in the virtuous cycle of research data.
Subject
Communication,Library and Information Sciences
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Why academics under‐share research data: A social relational theory;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2024-07-07
2. Advantages of Data Reuse Based on Disciplinary Diversity and Citation Count;Leveraging Generative Intelligence in Digital Libraries: Towards Human-Machine Collaboration;2023