Tree regeneration in models of forest dynamics: A key priority for further research

Author:

Díaz‐Yáñez Olalla1ORCID,Käber Yannek1ORCID,Anders Tim2ORCID,Bohn Friedrich3,Braziunas Kristin H.4ORCID,Brůna Josef5ORCID,Fischer Rico67ORCID,Fischer Samuel M.6ORCID,Hetzer Jessica2ORCID,Hickler Thomas2ORCID,Hochauer Christian8ORCID,Lexer Manfred J.8ORCID,Lischke Heike9,Mairota Paola10ORCID,Merganič Ján11ORCID,Merganičová Katarina1213ORCID,Mette Tobias14,Mina Marco15ORCID,Morin Xavier16ORCID,Nieberg Mats17ORCID,Rammer Werner4ORCID,Reyer Christopher P. O.17ORCID,Scheiter Simon2ORCID,Scherrer Daniel18,Bugmann Harald1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Systems Science Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Forest Ecology, ETH Zurich Zürich Switzerland

2. Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt am Main Germany

3. Department of Computational Hydrosystem Helmholtz‐Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany

4. Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Group TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich Freising Germany

5. Department of Geoecology Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic

6. Department of Ecological Modelling Helmholtz‐Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany

7. Institute for Forest Protection Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) ‐ Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Quedlinburg Germany

8. Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Silviculture University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria

9. Dynamic Macroecology Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland

10. Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta e degli Alimenti Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro Bari Italy

11. Department of Forest Harvesting, Logistics and Ameliorations, Faculty of Forestry Technical University in Zvolen Zvolen Slovakia

12. Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Suchdol Czech Republic

13. Department of Biodiversity of Ecosystems and Landscape Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia

14. Department of Soil and Climate Bavarian State Institute of Forestry Freising Germany

15. Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research Bolzano Italy

16. CEFE, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier, EPHE, IRD Montpellier France

17. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany

18. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractTree regeneration is a key process in forest dynamics, particularly in the context of forest resilience and climate change. Models are pivotal for assessing long‐term forest dynamics, and they have been in use for more than 50 years. However, there is a need to evaluate their capacity to accurately represent tree regeneration. We assess how well current models capture the overall abundance, species composition, and mortality of tree regeneration. Using 15 models built to capture long‐term forest dynamics at the stand, landscape, and global levels, we simulate tree regeneration at 200 sites representing large environmental gradients across Central Europe. The results are evaluated against extensive data from unmanaged forests. Most of the models overestimate recruitment levels, which is compensated only in some models by high simulated mortality rates in the early stages of individual‐tree dynamics. Simulated species diversity of recruitment generally matches observed ranges. Models simulating higher stand‐level species diversity do not feature higher species diversity in the recruitment layer. The effect of light availability on recruitment levels is captured better than the effects of temperature and soil moisture, but patterns are not consistent across models. Increasing complexity in the tree regeneration modules is not related to higher accuracy of simulated tree recruitment. Furthermore, individual model design is more important than scale (stand, landscape, and global) and approach (empirical and process‐based) for accurately capturing tree regeneration. Despite the mismatches between simulation results and data, it is remarkable that most models capture the essential features of the highly complex process of tree regeneration, while not having been parameterized with such data. We conclude that much can be gained by evaluating and refining the modeling of tree regeneration processes. This has the potential to render long‐term projections of forest dynamics under changing environmental conditions much more robust.

Funder

Akademie Věd České Republiky

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich

Publisher

Wiley

Reference90 articles.

1. Simulating forest resilience: A review

2. A Modified Sine Wave Method for Calculating Degree Days 1

3. ASTER Science Team.2019.“ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. 2019 Distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC.”https://doi.org/10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003.https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/astgtmv002/.

4. SEEDLING SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF THREE FOREST TREE SPECIES: THE ROLE OF SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY

5. Divergent reproductive allocation trade‐offs with canopy exposure across tree species in temperate forests

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3