Impact of the Children's Oncology Group's supportive care clinical practice guideline endorsement program: An institutional survey

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSupportive care clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) facilitate the incorporation of the best available evidence into pediatric cancer care. We aimed to assess the impact of the work of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Supportive Care Guideline Task Force on institutional supportive care practices.ProcedureAn online survey was distributed to representatives at 209 COG sites to assess the awareness, use, and helpfulness of COG‐endorsed supportive care CPGs. Availability of institutional policies regarding 13 topics addressed by current COG‐endorsed CPGs was also assessed. Respondents described their institutional processes for developing supportive care policies.ResultsRepresentatives from 92 COG sites responded to the survey, and 78% (72/92) were “very aware” of the COG‐endorsed supportive care CPGs. On average, sites had policies that addressed seven COG‐endorsed supportive care CPG topics (median = 7, range: 0‐12). Only 45% (41/92) of sites reported having institutional processes for developing supportive care policies. Of these, most (76%, 31/41) reported that the COG‐endorsed CPGs have a medium or large impact on policy development. Compared with sites without processes for supportive care policy development, sites with established processes had policies on a greater number of topics aligned with current COG‐endorsed CPG topics (mean = 6.6, range: 0‐12 vs mean = 7.9, range: 2‐12; p = 0.027).ConclusionsMost site respondents were aware of the COG‐endorsed supportive care CPGs. Less than half of the COG sites represented in the survey have processes in place to implement supportive care policies. Improvement in local implementation is required to ensure that patients at COG sites receive evidence‐based supportive care.