Affiliation:
1. Development Sciences UCB Biopharma SRL Braine‐l'Alleud Belgium
2. Patient Safety, UCB Biopharma SRL Braine‐l'Alleud Belgium
3. Patient Safety, UCB Biosciences GmbH Monheim Germany
4. B'SYS GmbH Witterswil Switzerland
5. Department of Computer Science University of Oxford Oxford UK
Abstract
AbstractLevetiracetam (LEV), a well‐established anti‐seizure medication (ASM), was launched before the original ICH S7B nonclinical guidance assessing QT prolongation potential and the introduction of the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm. No information was available on its effects on cardiac channels. The goal of this work was to “pressure test” the CiPA approach with LEV and check the concordance of nonclinical core and follow‐up S7B assays with clinical and post‐marketing data. The following experiments were conducted with LEV (0.25–7.5 mM): patch clamp assays on hERG (acute or trafficking effects), NaV1.5, CaV1.2, Kir2.1, KV7.1/mink, KV1.5, KV4.3, and HCN4; in silico electrophysiology modeling (Virtual Assay® software) in control, large‐variability, and high‐risk human ventricular cell populations; electrophysiology measurements in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)‐derived cardiomyocytes and dog Purkinje fibers; ECG measurements in conscious telemetered dogs after single oral administration (150, 300, and 600 mg/kg). Except a slight inhibition (<10%) of hERG and KV7.1/mink at 7.5 mM, that is, 30‐fold the free therapeutic plasma concentration (FTPC) at 1500 mg, LEV did not affect any other cardiac channels or hERG trafficking. In both virtual and real human cardiomyocytes, and in dog Purkinje fibers, LEV induced no relevant changes in electrophysiological parameters or arrhythmia. No QTc prolongation was noted up to 2.7 mM unbound plasma levels in conscious dogs, corresponding to 10‐fold the FTPC. Nonclinical assessment integrating CiPA assays shows the absence of QT prolongation and proarrhythmic risk of LEV up to at least 10‐fold the FTPC and the good concordance with clinical and postmarketing data, although this does not exclude very rare occurrence of QT prolongation cases in patients with underlying risk factors.
Funder
National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
Wellcome Trust
Subject
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,Neurology
Reference39 articles.
1. Anon.ICH S7B: The nonclinical evaluation of the potential for delayed ventricular repolarization (QT interval prolongation) by human pharmaceuticals. CPMP/ICH/423/02;2005; London http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/ich/042302en.pdf.
2. Anon.ICH guideline E14/S7B: clinical and nonclinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential‐questions and answers. EMA/CHMP/ICH/415588/2020.https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific‐guideline/ich‐guideline‐e14/s7b‐clinical‐nonclinical‐evaluation‐qt/.AccessedApril 20 2022. qtc‐interval‐prolongation‐proarrhythmic‐potential‐questions‐answers‐step‐5_en.pdf
3. Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia assay, a novel in vitro/in silico paradigm to detect ventricular proarrhythmic liability: a visionary 21st century initiative;Cavero I;Expert Opin Drug Saf,2014
4. Evolution of strategies to improve preclinical cardiac safety testing
5. Effect of levetiracetam on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects: A single-dose, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, four-way crossover study
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献