Differential effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of drill‐based interventions targeting multiplication facts

Author:

Adams Sarah R.1,Maki Kathrin E.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Family Medicine Franciscan Health Indianapolis Indiana USA

2. Department of Special Education, School Psychology, and Early Childhood Studies University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractMath facts are foundational for later math skill development, but many students demonstrate difficulties with math facts in early schooling. Drill‐based interventions have been shown to effectively target foundational academic skills; however, there is limited research examining drill‐based interventions for teaching math facts compared to basic reading skills. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of incremental rehearsal (IR), traditional drill (TD), and strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR) on multiplication fact retention, fluency, and maintenance outcomes with 36 fourth and fifth graders. The study also examined intervention efficiency and treatment acceptability. Results showed no differences in retention, maintenance, or treatment acceptability across the interventions. There were significant differences in fluency at posttest, with IR resulting in the greatest fluency scores. Furthermore, TD was the most efficient intervention overall. Implications for practice and future research are also discussed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference63 articles.

1. Teachers' and Students' Preferences for Mathematics Interventions: Implications for Teacher Acceptability in Consultation

2. Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge

3. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs

4. Empirical Analysis of Drill Ratio Research

5. Using incremental rehearsal to increase fluency of single‐digit multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation;Burns M. K.;Education and Treatment of Children,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3