Prevalence and clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 in patients with pre‐existing celiac disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Rathore Sawai Singh1ORCID,Velasquez‐Botero Felipe23ORCID,Nieto‐Salazar María Alejandra4ORCID,Flowers Thomas C.5,Hasan Jamal6,Parashar Ashwani Kumar1,Tanveer Khurram7,Aneis Hamam8,Buremoh Ayotunde Isaac9,Yusuf Keturah10,Khalil Khalil11,Toro‐Velandia Adriana Carolina24,Sabeeh Shireen Kh.12

Affiliation:

1. Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College Jodhpur Rajasthan India

2. Larkin Community Hospital Miami Florida USA

3. Universidad CES Medellin Colombia

4. Juan N. Corpas University Bogotá District of Colombia Colombia

5. All Saints University College of Medicine Amos Vale Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

6. Beirut Private Hospital Baghdad Iraq

7. Washington University of Health and Science San Pedro Belize

8. The Emirates Health Services Alqassimi Hospital Sharjah UAE

9. University College Hospital University of Ibadan Ibadan Oyo state Nigeria

10. Federal High Court Clinic Abuja Nigeria

11. Department of Emergency Medicine The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn UK

12. Al‐Numan Teaching Hospital Baghdad Iraq

Abstract

AbstractThere is a scarcity of scientific evidence addressing the outcomes of COVID‐19 in celiac disease (CD) patients. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the correlation between pre‐existing CD and COVID‐19. A rigorous literature search was conducted using multiple databases. All eligible observational studies were included from around the globe. The random effect model calculated the pooled prevalence and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Mantel‐Haenszel odds ratios were produced to report the overall effect size using random effect models for severity and mortality outcomes. Funnel plots, Egger regression tests, and Begg‐Mazumdar's rank correlation test were used to appraise publication bias. Data from 11 articles consisting of 44,378 CD patients were obtained. Overall pooled random‐effects estimate of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in CD patients was 4.25% (95% CI, I2 = 98%). Our findings also indicated that pre‐existing CD was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation with COVID‐19 illness (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.87–1.24, I2 = 0%) and mortality due to illness (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.56–1.5, I2 = 45%) compared with patients without pre‐existing CD. No significant publication bias was evident in the meta‐analysis. The preliminary data from our analysis suggest that SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with pre‐existing CD is not associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation or mortality. Additional studies are required to overcome the restrictions of the limited data available at present.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Virology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3