Improving patient outcomes following vital sign monitoring protocol failure: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsVital sign monitoring needs to be timely and correct to recognize deteriorating patients early and trigger the relevant clinical response. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate compliance specifically toward the regional vital sign monitoring protocol the so called early warning score protocol (EWS‐protocol) 72 h before a medical emergency team response (MET‐response) and thereby illuminate whether poor compliance translates into a worse patient outcome.MethodsIt was investigated all eligible patients that underwent MET responses during the calendar year 2019. The inclusion criteria encompassed somatic patients above 18 years of age admitted to the hospital and detailed evaluations of the medical records of the included patients were conducted.ResultsFour hundred and twenty‐nine MET‐responses were included in the final analysis. EWS‐protocol failure was observed for more than half the patients within all the time frames assessed. Thirty‐day mortality was significantly higher for patients subject to EWS protocol failure in the timeframes 24−16, 16−8, 8−0 h before MET response. Adjusting for admission length, age, and gender, patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.3 for mortality in the time frames 72−48, 24−16, 16−8, and 8−0 h before the MET‐response, respectively. The adjusted OR for ICU‐admission was 1.7, and 1.6 for patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure in the time frames 16−8 and 8−0 h before MET‐response, respectively.ConclusionAccording to all the data analysis in this article, there is evidence that compliance toward the NEWS‐protocol is poor. EWS‐protocol failure is associated with a significant higher mortality and ICU‐admission rate.