The influence of fence design on the movement patterns of eastern long‐necked turtles

Author:

Dowling James M.1ORCID,Bower Deborah S.1ORCID,Boscarino‐Gaetano Remo1ORCID,Nordberg Eric J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Environmental and Rural Science University of New England Armidale 2351 NSW Australia

Abstract

AbstractFences disturb the movements of terrestrial species, altering migration patterns, limiting access to vital resources, and reducing genetic diversity. With almost 40% of the Earth's land surface converted for agriculture, farm fencing to protect crops and corral livestock is expected to stretch into the millions of kilometers. As semi‐terrestrial ectotherms, freshwater turtles are threatened by fences that limit access to resources and increase risks of desiccation, entanglement, and overheating, often resulting in death. To determine the effect of fences, we quantified the movement patterns for a population of eastern long‐necked turtles (Chelodina longicollis) inhabiting an agricultural landscape near Armidale, New South Wales, Australia from November 2022 to September 2023. There was considerable variation in the distance traveled, home range size, and movement corridor selection between turtles that was not explained by the morphological factors of size, mass, or the loss of a limb (likely due to predation attempts). On average, 38% ± 4.70 ( ± SE) of turtle movements were terrestrial (overland) during their active season (spring and summer) during which they encountered fences frequently because of a complex matrix of paddocks. Fence design dictated the distance turtles traveled to locate a suitable passage point. The majority of fences allowed turtles to pass (turtle‐friendly fences, 71.4% of total fence distance) as opposed to turtle‐unfriendly fences (28.6% of total fence distance). Turtles were required to travel almost 4 times the distance to locate a suitable crossing point (a gap or fault in the fence) when they encountered an unfriendly fence (85.32 m ± 29.81) compared to a turtle‐friendly fence (25.85 m ± 3.58). Our results highlight the need for land managers to avoid small‐diameter exclusion fencing and fence designs containing chicken wire that extend to or below ground level. In settings where small‐diameter wire fencing is required, we recommend the installation of turtle gates for small terrestrial fauna or elevating bottom wires at least 50 mm above ground level to facilitate fence permeability.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference97 articles.

1. Addison J. S.1990. A guide to barbed wire fence construction for range cattle control. Bulletin 4183. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Perth Western Australia Australia.

2. Mitigation measures to reduce highway mortality of turtles and other herpetofauna at a North Florida lake;Aresco M. J.;Journal of Wildlife Management,2005

3. Irrigated agriculture in the Murray‐Darling Basin: a farm level analysis by region and industry;Ashton D.;ABARES Insights,2009

4. Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4;Bates D.;Journal of Statistical Software,2015

5. Mitigating reptile road mortality: fence failures compromise ecopassage effectiveness;Baxter‐Gilbert J. H.;PLoS ONE,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3