Random and systematic uncertainty in ship‐based seawater carbonate chemistry observations

Author:

Carter Brendan R.12ORCID,Sharp Jonathan D.12,García‐Ibáñez Maribel I.3ORCID,Woosley Ryan J.4ORCID,Fong Michael B.5ORCID,Álvarez Marta6,Barbero Leticia78ORCID,Clegg Simon L.9,Easley Regina5,Fassbender Andrea J.2,Li Xinyu10,Schockman Katelyn M.78ORCID,Wang Zhaohui Aleck11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cooperative Institute for Climate Ocean and Ecosystem Studies University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

2. Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington USA

3. Instituto Español de Oceanografía Palma Spain

4. Center for Global Change Science, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts USA

5. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemical Sciences Division Gaithersburg Maryland USA

6. Instituto Español de Oceanografía A Coruña Spain

7. Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences University of Miami Miami Florida USA

8. Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Miami Florida USA

9. School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK

10. School of Marine Science and Policy University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA

11. Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractSeawater carbonate chemistry observations are increasingly necessary to study a broad array of oceanographic challenges such as ocean acidification, carbon inventory tracking, and assessment of marine carbon dioxide removal strategies. The uncertainty in a seawater carbonate chemistry observation comes from unknown random variations and systematic offsets. Here, we estimate the magnitudes of these random and systematic components of uncertainty for the discrete open‐ocean carbonate chemistry measurements in the Global Ocean Data Analysis Project 2022 update (GLODAPv2.2022). We use both an uncertainty propagation approach and a carbonate chemistry measurement “inter‐consistency” approach that quantifies the disagreement between measured carbonate chemistry variables and calculations of the same variables from other carbonate chemistry measurements. Our inter‐consistency analysis reveals that the seawater carbonate chemistry measurement community has collected and released data with a random uncertainty that averages about 1.7 times the uncertainty estimated by propagating the desired “climate‐quality” random uncertainties. However, we obtain differing random uncertainty estimates for subsets of the available data, with some subsets seemingly meeting the climate‐quality criteria. We find that seawater pH measurements on the total scale do not meet the climate‐quality criteria, though the inter‐consistency of these measurements improves (by 38%) when limited to the subset of measurements made using purified indicator dyes. We show that GLODAPv2 adjustments improve inter‐consistency for some subsets of the measurements while worsening it for others. Finally, we provide general guidance for quantifying the random uncertainty that applies for common combinations of measured and calculated values.

Funder

National Science Foundation

NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Publisher

Wiley

Reference58 articles.

1. Global Ocean Spectrophotometric pH Assessment: Consistent Inconsistencies

2. BIPM IEC IFCC ILAC ISO IUPAC IUPAP and OIML.2008.Evaluation of measurement data‐guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6

3. An inter-laboratory comparison assessing the quality of seawater carbon dioxide measurements

4. Reassessing Southern Ocean Air‐Sea CO 2 Flux Estimates With the Addition of Biogeochemical Float Observations

5. Production of a reference material for seawater pHT measurements by a National Metrology Institute

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3