Comparison of multivariate post‐processing methods using global ECMWF ensemble forecasts

Author:

Lakatos Mária12,Lerch Sebastian3ORCID,Hemri Stephan4ORCID,Baran Sándor1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Informatics University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

2. Doctoral School of Informatics University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

3. Institute of Economics Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Karlsruhe Germany

4. Department of Mathematics University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractAn influential step in weather forecasting was the introduction of ensemble forecasts in operational use owing to their capability to account for the uncertainties in the future state of the atmosphere. However, ensemble weather forecasts are often underdispersive and might also contain bias, which calls for some form of post‐processing. A popular approach to calibration is the ensemble model output statistics approach resulting in a full predictive distribution for a given weather variable. However, this form of univariate post‐processing may ignore the prevailing spatial and/or temporal correlation structures among different dimensions. Since many applications call for spatially and/or temporally coherent forecasts, multivariate post‐processing aims to capture these possibly lost dependencies. We compare the forecast skill of different non‐parametric multivariate approaches to modeling temporal dependence of ensemble weather forecasts with different forecast horizons. The focus is on two‐step methods, where, after univariate post‐processing, the ensemble model output statistics predictive distributions corresponding to different forecast horizons are combined to a multivariate calibrated prediction using an empirical copula. Based on global ensemble predictions of temperature, wind speed, and precipitation accumulation of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts from January 2002 to March 2014, we investigate the forecast skill of different versions of ensemble copula coupling (ECC) and Schaake shuffle. In general, compared with the raw and independently calibrated forecasts, multivariate post‐processing substantially improves the forecast skill. Although even the simplest ECC approach with low computational cost provides a powerful benchmark method, recently proposed advanced extensions of the ECC and the Schaake shuffle are found to not provide any significant improvements over their basic counterparts.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal

Vector Stiftung

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Atmospheric Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3