Affiliation:
1. Office of Medical Student Research Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa Oklahoma USA
2. Department of Internal Medicine Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa Oklahoma USA
3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA
4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa Oklahoma USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate published clinical trials of ramucirumab to assess the risk/benefit profile and burden over time for patients.BackgroundThe burden of oncologic drug development on patients paired with increasing clinical trial failure rates emphasizes the need for reform of drug development. Identifying and addressing patterns of excess burden can guide policy, ensure evidence‐based protections for trial participants, and improve medical decision‐making.MethodsOn May 25, 2023 a literature search was performed on Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical trials using ramucirumab as monotherapy or in combination with other interventions for cancer treatment. Authors screened titles and abstracts for potential inclusion in a masked, duplicate fashion. Following data screening, data was extracted in a masked, duplicate fashion. Trials were classified as positive when meeting their primary endpoint and safety, negative or indeterminate.ResultsRamucirumab was initially approved for gastric cancer but has since been tested in 20 cancers outside of its FDA approved indications. In our analysis of ramucirumab trials, there were a total of 10,936 participants and 10,303 adverse events reported. Gains in overall survival and progression‐free survival for patients were 1.5 and 1.2 months, respectively. FDA‐approved indications have reported more positive outcomes in comparison to off‐label indications.ConclusionWe found that FDA‐approved indications for ramucirumab had better efficacy outcomes than non‐approved indications. However, a concerning number of adverse events were observed across all trials assessed. Participants in ramucirumab randomized controlled trials saw meager gains in overall survival when evaluated against a comparison group. Clinicians should carefully weigh the risks associated with ramucirumab therapy given its toxicity burden and poor survival gains.
Reference33 articles.
1. Stomach cancer ‐ statistics.Cancer.Net. Published June 25 2012. Accessed June 21 2023.https://www.cancer.net/cancer‐types/stomach‐cancer/statistics
2. Ramucirumab: a new therapy for advanced gastric cancer;Oholendt AL;J Adv Pract Oncol,2015
3. Life Cycle of Translational Research for Medical Interventions
4. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
5. Drug discovery and development: Role of basic biological research