Affiliation:
1. De Nederlandsche Bank Amsterdam Alberta The Netherlands
2. School of Economics Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractThe Dutch healthcare insurance reform in 2006 replaced the dual system of public and private insurance with a single compulsory health insurance scheme, in which insurance providers compete for customers in a free market. This paper investigates whether competition among healthcare insurers has indeed increased and their efficiency has improved. We measure competition directly from either shifts in market shares, or developments in profits, using Dutch regulatory data. We find that a structural break occurs after the reform: competition is significantly higher after 2006 than before. This holds both for the analysis based on shifts in market shares and that based on profits. Several robustness tests confirm this outcome. Hence, the reform has had a significant impact. Nevertheless, we find that the health insurance sector is still less competitive than financial sectors such as banking and life insurance.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference29 articles.
1. Competition in the Dutch health insurance market, interim report, Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM);ACM;Monitor Financial Sector,2016
2. Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?;Berger A. N.;Journal of Banking and Finance,1997
3. Performance of the life insurance industry under pressure: Efficiency. Competition and consolidation;Bikker J. A.;Risk Management & Insurance Review,2016
4. Competition and scale economy effects of the Dutch 2006 healthcare insurance reform;Bikker J. A.;Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice,2017
5. Restructuring of the Dutch nonlife insurance industry: Consolidation. Organisational form and focus;Bikker J. A.;The Journal of Risk and Insurance,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献