High performance of the DNA methylation‐based WID‐qEC test for detecting uterine cancers independent of sampling modalities

Author:

Illah Ojone1ORCID,Scott Malcolm1ORCID,Redl Elisa2ORCID,Barrett James E.2ORCID,Schreiberhuber Lena2ORCID,Herzog Chiara2ORCID,Vavourakis Charlotte D.2ORCID,Jones Allison1,Evans Iona1,Reisel Dan1,Chandrasekaran Dhivya3,Doufekas Kostas3,Graham Radha3ORCID,Kotsopoulos Ioannis C.3,MacDonald Nicola3,Arora Rupali4,Olaitan Adeola1,Rosenthal Adam13,Widschwendter Martin1256ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women's Cancer UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London London UK

2. European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, Universität Innsbruck Hall in Tirol Austria

3. Department of Gynaecological Oncology University College London Hospital London UK

4. Department of Pathology University College London Hospital London UK

5. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics General Hospital Hall, Tirol Kliniken Hall in Tirol Austria

6. Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

AbstractEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most prevalent gynaecological cancer in high‐income countries and its incidence is continuing to rise sharply. Simple and objective tools to reliably detect women with EC are urgently needed. We recently developed and validated the DNA methylation (DNAme)‐based women's cancer risk identification—quantitative polymerase chain reaction test for endometrial cancer (WID‐qEC) test that could address this need. Here, we demonstrate that the stability of the WID‐qEC test remains consistent regardless of: (i) the cervicovaginal collection device and sample media used (Cervex brush and PreservCyt or FLOQSwab and eNAT), (ii) the collector of the specimen (gynaecologist‐ or patient‐based), and (iii) the precise sampling site (cervical, cervicovaginal and vaginal). Furthermore, we demonstrate sample stability in eNAT medium for 7 days at room temperature, greatly facilitating the implementation of the test into diagnostic laboratory workflows. When applying FLOQSwabs (Copan) in combination with the eNAT (Copan) sample collection media, the sensitivity and specificity of the WID‐qEC test to detect uterine (i.e., endometrial and cervical) cancers in gynaecologist‐taken samples was 92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 75.0%–98.8%) and 98.6% (95% CI = 91.7%–99.9%), respectively, whilst the sensitivity and specificity in patient collected self‐samples was 75.0% (95% CI = 47.4%–91.7%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 93.9%–100.0%), respectively. Taken together these data confirm the robustness and clinical potential of the WID‐qEC test.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3