The examination assessment of technical competence in vascular surgery

Author:

Pandey V A1,Wolfe J H N1,Liapis C D2,Bergqvist D3

Affiliation:

1. Regional Vascular Unit, Mary Stanford Wing, St. Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK

2. Department of Athens University School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, 16 Sevastoupoleus St., 11526 Athens, Greece

3. Department of Surgery, University Hospital, SE 75185 Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background The European Board of Surgery Qualification in Vascular Surgery is a pan-European examination for vascular surgeons who have attained a national certificate of completion of specialist training. A 2-year study was conducted before the introduction of a technical skills assessment in the examination. Methods The study included 30 surgeons: 22 candidates and eight examiners. They were tested on dissection (on a synthetic saphenofemoral junction model), anastomosis (on to anterior tibial artery of a synthetic leg model) and dexterity (a knot-tying simulator with electromagnetic motion analysis). Validated rating scales were used by two independent examiners. Composite knot-tying scores were calculated for the computerized station. The stations were weighted 35, 45 and 20 per cent, respectively. Results Examiners performed better than candidates in the dissection (P < 0·001), anastomosis (P = 0·002) and dexterity (P = 0·005) stations. Participants performed consistently in the examination (dissection versus anastomosis: r = 0·79, P < 0·001; dexterity versus total operative score: r = −0·73, P < 0·001). Interobserver reliability was high (α = 0·91). No correlation was seen between a candidate's technical skill and oral examination performance or logbook-accredited scores. Conclusion Current surgical examinations do not address technical competence. This model appears to be a valid assessment of technical skills in an examination setting. The standards are set at a level appropriate for a specialist vascular surgeon.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3