Comparison of typical radiation doses and risks using an anthropomorphic ‘bone fracture’ phantom for commonly performed X‐ray projections in a 5‐year‐old

Author:

Doyle Edel1ORCID,Dimmock Matthew R23ORCID,Lee Kam L4ORCID,Thomas Peter4ORCID,Bassed Richard B15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forensic Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. School of Allied Health Professions Keele University Keele UK

4. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency Yallambie Victoria Australia

5. Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine Academic Programs Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction: Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are typical dose levels for medical imaging examinations for groups of standard‐sized patients or standard phantoms for broadly defined types of equipment used as a tool to aid optimisation of protection for medical exposures. Currently, there are no paediatric DRLs for conventional radiography (i.e. general X‐rays) published in Australia. The aim of this study was to establish typical radiation doses and risks that are representative of those delivered for commonly performed X‐ray projections for a 5‐year‐old/20 kg child using a 5‐year‐old anthropomorphic ‘bone fracture’ phantom in three dedicated paediatric radiology departments in Victoria. Methods: A total of 20 projection images were acquired for a standard 5‐year‐old/20 kg phantom using digital radiography X‐ray equipment. The air kerma‐area product (KAP) measured at each centre by a KAP metre, which was calibrated to a national primary standard, was considered to represent the median value for that centre for each X‐ray projection. Organ doses and effective dose were estimated using PCXMC software, and risks of radiation‐induced cancer and radiation‐induced death were calculated based on the BEIR VII report. Results: The typical doses for the individual X‐ray projections ranged from 3 mGy•cm2 to 86 mGy•cm2, whilst the effective doses ranged from 0.00004 to 0.07 mSv. The radiation risks were ‘minimal’ to ‘negligible’. Conclusion: The estimation of typical radiation doses and associated risks for a 5‐year‐old/20 kg phantom study provides reference values for guidance and is a first step in assisting optimisation at other institutions until national DRLs, based on patient data from the clinical setting, are published.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Reference20 articles.

1. International Commission on Radiation Protection. ICRP Publication 135.Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging.2017. Available from:https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20135. (Accessed 14 April 2022).

2. Australian Government.Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Act 1998.1998. Available from:https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2004A00383. (Accessed 9 July 2022).

3. Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common radiological examinations using the European guidelines;Almén A;Br J Radiol,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3