The effect of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy on long‐term survival outcomes in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDespite histological and molecular differences between invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive carcinoma of no special type, according to national treatment guidelines no distinction is made regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies on the long‐term outcome of chemotherapy in patients with ILC are scarce and show inconclusive results.MethodsAll patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative ILC with an indication for chemotherapy treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy were selected from the Erasmus Medical Center Breast Cancer database. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of chemotherapy on recurrence‐free survival (RFS), breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 520 patients were selected, of whom 379 were treated with chemotherapy and 141 were not. Patients in the chemotherapy group were younger (51 vs. 61 years old; p < .001), had a higher T status (T3+, 33% vs. 14%; p < .001), and more often had lymph node involvement (80% vs. 49%; p < .001) in comparison to the no‐chemotherapy group. After adjusting for confounders, chemotherapy treatment was not associated with better RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63–2.31), BCSS (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.60–2.58), or OS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.56–1.66). This was also reflected by adjusted Cox survival curves in the chemotherapy versus no‐chemotherapy group for RFS (75% vs. 79%), BCSS (80% vs. 84%), and OS (72% vs. 71%).ConclusionsChemotherapy is not associated with improved RFS, BCSS, or OS for patients with ER+/HER2− ILC treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy and with an indication for chemotherapy.