Longevity and other practical benefits of monolithic silica columns in the analysis of samples with complex matrices

Abstract

At the turn of the millennium, the monolithic columns invoked new chances in HPLC. Even more than their organic polymer‐based siblings, the inorganic silica‐based monoliths targeted the territory of classical fully porous particle‐packed columns, promising many benefits. Based on the number of published articles, the monoliths attracted academics just in the first few years after their introduction to the market. Lately, as superficially porous particles and sub‐2‐micron fully porous particles dominated the market, they stayed in the focus of routine laboratories and those who really appreciated the high porosity of the monolithic bed. The monoliths' practical benefits cannot be easily traced in the literature when they gradually lose academics' interest. Nevertheless, after more than 20 years of our experience, we still favor silica monoliths for their low back pressure and longevity when analyzing samples of clinical, pharmaceutical, and environmental origin. At the same time, the high permeability of monoliths enabled the birth of sequential injection chromatography, the medium‐pressure separation technique based on the flexible flow manifold.This minireview aims to check, discuss, and summarize the practical aspects of monolithic silica columns in HPLC and medium‐pressure sequential injection chromatography (SIC) that may not be visible at first sight but are evident retrospectively.